What strategy can a teacher use to enhance the effectiveness of peer-editing in student writing assessments?

Providing a rubric or checklist for review is an effective strategy for enhancing peer-editing in student writing assessments because it gives students clear criteria to follow. A rubric or checklist outlines specific elements of writing that need attention, such as thesis clarity, paragraph structure, grammar, and punctuation. This guidance helps peer reviewers focus their feedback on essential aspects of writing, leading to more constructive comments and a more thorough editing process.

With a rubric in hand, students can engage more meaningfully with each other's work, as they have defined standards to observe and discuss. It encourages them to think critically about the writing and enables them to provide specific suggestions rather than vague opinions. This structured approach also helps students who may feel unsure about what to look for during editing, making the process more accessible and beneficial for all participants. By incorporating this clarity, the quality of the peer-editing experience improves significantly, leading to better-written assessments overall.