What conclusion can be drawn about students working collaboratively in writing tasks?

The conclusion that students working collaboratively in writing tasks enhances their understanding of paraphrasing and summarization is supported by the benefits of collaborative learning environments. When students work together, they can share ideas, discuss different ways to express thoughts, and provide feedback on each other's writing. This interaction encourages them to consider how to restate concepts in their own words (paraphrasing) and to condense information into shorter formats (summarization).

Collaboration fosters a deeper comprehension of the material, as students must articulate their understanding and reasoning, which leads to more effective learning strategies. This peer engagement makes the writing process more dynamic, allowing students to learn from one another's strengths and perspectives, ultimately reinforcing their skills in paraphrasing and summarization.

In contrast, the other options do not capture the full scope of benefits derived from collaborative writing tasks. For example, saying it only requires teacher guidance overlooks the active role that peers play in each other’s learning. Similarly, while developing the ability to edit one’s work is beneficial, it does not specifically address the skills of paraphrasing and summarization that are central to collaborative tasks. Lastly, stating that collaboration is counterproductive to independent writing ignores the fact that skills learned through collaboration can enhance individual